Extract:
“Jane Austen’s literary works and the subsequent screen media adaptations feature beautiful British stately homes surrounded by picturesque landscapes and gardens. The estates in her novels are inspired by real-life counterparts across the breadth of Britain which are then also repurposed as film sets in adaptations to represent the ideals and aesthetics of Regency Britain so celebrated in academic and popular cultural spaces alike.
However, in September 2020, a National Trust inquiry evidenced something many already knew: lots of Britain’s celebrated heritage sites were sustained by money generated by global colonialism. At least twenty-nine properties are tethered to successful claims made during the compensation scheme, where the UK Government gave £20m to the planter-class for their loss of enslaved people, classified as ‘property’ by colonial laws. […]
In this piece I discuss the racism that continues in Austen spaces that refuses to address what Edward Said long ago pointed out in his discussion of Mansfield Park, namely, that the rural spaces of Austen’s landed families are intimately connected with the economic growth of plantation economies in the Caribbean.”